W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Geolocation Errata and Updated Working Draft

From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:06:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF40kP4aN2o2WrrQa-VrjNXFfK3ZrtsRb6GzKxcDdpwJWhg0Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
All good then, and thanks for the quick updates Dom :-)

I think NoInterfaceObject also does not apply to dictionary (Section 5.2).

Regards,

Michael



On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Le jeudi 10 juillet 2014 à 14:33 +0100, Michael van Ouwerkerk a écrit :
> > please find some notes below.
> >
> Thanks a lot for sending these!
> >
> > In http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/ it states that NoInterfaceObject "must
> > not be specified on partial interface definitions". So in section 5.1
> > it must not be specified for "partial interface Navigator".
> >
> Fixed in http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html
> >
> > The wrong sections of 5.2 have been deleted. The meaning of the
> > PositionOptions attributes should not be deleted. Instead, the
> > sections describing their default values must be deleted as that is
> > now expressed in WebIDL.
> >
> Fixed as well.
>
> http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%
> 2Fgeolocation-API%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fgeo%2Fapi%
> 2Fspec-source.html
> >
> > Some changes have already been made in Blink to conform to these
> > errata,
>
> Great!
>
> >  but there is no true support yet for dictionaries. This is tracked in
> > http:/crbug.com/321462
> > Also, who is our new staff contact?
>
> I'm your staff contact while we try and find a replacement for Jinsong.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Dom
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 18:07:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:51:08 UTC