- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:10:13 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 15:10:40 UTC
That looks like a meat solution. Thanks Dom! /m On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote: > On ven., 2014-02-14 at 10:56 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > > Attached yet another version of the errata, that removes the indication > > of removing [NoInterfaceObject], and adds that NavigatorGeolocation > > would be better rewritten as a partial interface. > > And another version again, taking into account my latest message on > [Clamp] and Infinity [1] — I have thus abandoned the idea of removing > the mentions of Infinity in the prose. > > To see where we stand with regard to the edits I brought since the first > version of the errata in my Call for Consensus, see > http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org% > 2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0012% > 2Fgeoapi-errata.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic% > 2Fpublic-geolocation%2F2014Feb%2Fatt-0022%2Fgeoapi-errata.html > > Dom > > > 1. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2014Feb/0021.html >
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 15:10:40 UTC