- From: Philip Gladstone <pgladsto@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:23:08 -0400
- To: public-geolocation@w3.org
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 20:26:19 UTC
When looking through the proposed recommendation, I was puzzled by the fact that section 4.2 is normative. Since all the requirements to 4.2 apply to the *recipient* of the geolocation information, and not to the implementation, doesn't this make it impossible for any vendor to produce a conformant implementation of the geolocation API in a browser (as they cannot assure that the resulting system will be in accordance with 4.2)? I suspect that the section is really missing the 'This section is non-normative' label. Philip -- Philip Gladstone Distinguished Engineer Product Development pgladstone@cisco.com Phone: +1 978-ZEN-TOAD (+1 978 936 8623) Google: +1 978 800 1010 Ham radio: N1DQ
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 20:26:19 UTC