W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > May 2012

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Geolocation API Specification is W3C Proposed Recommendation'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of innovimax+w3c@gmail.com <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:15:02 +0000
To: innovimax+w3c@gmail.com,public-geolocation@w3.org,w3c-ac-forum@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-c6318019b12d72078cfa185006b03b67@cgi.w3.org>

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Call for Review:
Geolocation API Specification is W3C Proposed Recommendation' (Advisory
Committee) for INNOVIMAX by Mohamed ZERGAOUI.

Regarding the "Geolocation API Specification" specification, the reviewer 
suggests changes, and only supports publication as a Recommendation if the
changes are adopted [Formal Objection].


Additional comments about the specification:
   == Positionning system ==
GPS is mentionned a various position in the Spec. But what about
compatibility with GLONASS, Compass, Galileo, etc.

== References ==
[BrowsingContext] and [Navigator] are both pointing to HTML5 normatively
but to two different link. Those link should be the same.

The link to [GearsLOC] points to nothing (content has been removed by
Google)

LocationAware website is in Japanese : it should either says it or provide
an english counterpart

WebIDL is normative reference to a Candidate Recommendation. So this spec
should be move to REC *after* the WebIDL and should be updated accordingly



The reviewer's organization:
   - produces products addressed by this specification
   - expects to use products conforming to this specification.

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/geoapi/ until 2012-06-10.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 18:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:51:05 UTC