- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:15:34 +0100
- To: "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:18:20 +0100, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> Host is not really good either. You want to know secure versus insecure >> for instance. > > Hmm, why is this? Nobody (including Opera) does this at the moment. Okay, maybe it is not too important for dialogs. >> Now whether this is displayed as a lock versus http/https should >> be up to the user agent. In fact, if the user agent comes up with a >> novel idea to clearly indicate what page the dialog belongs to I think >> that should be allowed as well. > > If we said "host", that wouldn't prevent the UA from doing what you > propose. It would technically prevent e.g. just showing the name for HTTPS EV sites. I am not sure it would stop implementors, but it does show MUST is too strong. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 14:16:30 UTC