- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:39:19 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 16:14 +0000, Andrei Popescu a écrit : >> So that's the context: power saving, not privacy. If the attribute had >> the better name of "lowPowerOnly", would you be making the same >> suggestion? > > I would probably argue of changing the name to make it easier to add the > privacy semantics :) > And I would then explain that the appropriate solution is for the UA to implement some kind of location fuzzing and I would point you to the appropriate thread stared by Doug :) > I'm still not sure what's the perceived cost of that approach? > You are trying to hijack the semantics of an attribute that has a completely unrelated meaning to the one you suggest. Thanks, Andrei
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 16:39:51 UTC