- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:26:22 +0100
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 16:14 +0000, Andrei Popescu a écrit : > So that's the context: power saving, not privacy. If the attribute had > the better name of "lowPowerOnly", would you be making the same > suggestion? I would probably argue of changing the name to make it easier to add the privacy semantics :) I'm still not sure what's the perceived cost of that approach? Dom
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 16:26:40 UTC