- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:51:25 +0100
- To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Le jeudi 25 mars 2010 à 00:40 +0800, Thomson, Martin a écrit : > For one, your proposal places control over privacy in the wrong hands > - those of the entity least interested in that characteristic. This is assuming that developers never are interested in privacy, and that helping privacy a bit for developers that are interested is not providing any privacy advantage. I guess I disagree with these two assumptions. > This attribute is largely meaningless and therefore useless. A way to > negotiate accuracy, as a three-way negotiation, is probably something > that I hope will be considered for the next version. I agree that accuracy negotiation would be better, but given that I don't think this can make it for this version, I thought that at least improving (even by a tiny fraction) the current version was better than nothing. Dom
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:51:38 UTC