- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:55:33 +0200
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: "Greg Bolsinga" <bolsinga@apple.com>, "Doug Turner" <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:52:22 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > These extensions can be discussed as: > > 1. Normative language with a MUST (which I'm seeing opposition against) > 2. Normative language with a SHOULD (which I saw Hixie and Lars Erik > suggest earlier) > 3. Non-normative guidance (which I'd be willing to accept, as I said > earlier; in that case, I'd like to re-add the examples and elaborate a > bit more on the text) > > My question is whether there is opposition against 2 or 3. You could also have normative language with a "MAY". To make it clear it is allowed, but not required if it is not desirable. Since it is a UI matter that seems perfectly reasonable. (To me, anyway.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:56:20 UTC