On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> however, i still think the implementations should take the timeout >>> starting >>> point to mean "after the user has granted permission" for many reasons, >>> one >>> being this can not be emulated by window.setTimeout. >> >> Ok...but I'm still struggling to find an example where this behavior >> would be useful. Do you have a concrete example? > > > I can not. > > however, i did mention the weird user interactions we get if the timeout is > based on invocation time -- that is, the permission dialog could be accepted > at the same time that the timeout happens. The user would think that they > just approved the request, and expect that the ua starts doing geolocation > stuff. > Ok, let's do it as you suggest. Unless anyone else objects, I will update the spec and post a link to the diff. Thanks, AndreiReceived on Thursday, 19 March 2009 11:20:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:52 UTC