W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Civic Address for V2

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Alec Berntson <alecb@windows.microsoft.com>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0903032130240.8214@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Marc Linsner wrote:
>
> Take a look at:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arai-ecrit-japan-req-01

Could you give an actual concrete example of an actual address that can't 
be mapped to the proposed 9-field idea?

I don't doubt that you are right, but the ID above doesn't seem to include 
such addresses and the structures it gives use fewer than 9 fields for the 
address, and the actual geographic addresses in that ID are similarly able 
to fit in a 9-field address structure, so I'm not really sure I understand 
the problem. An actual example would be of great help here.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 21:33:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:52 UTC