- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Alec Berntson <alecb@windows.microsoft.com>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Marc Linsner wrote: > > Take a look at: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arai-ecrit-japan-req-01 Could you give an actual concrete example of an actual address that can't be mapped to the proposed 9-field idea? I don't doubt that you are right, but the ID above doesn't seem to include such addresses and the structures it gives use fewer than 9 fields for the address, and the actual geographic addresses in that ID are similarly able to fit in a 9-field address structure, so I'm not really sure I understand the problem. An actual example would be of great help here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 21:33:52 UTC