- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:58:10 -0800
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, Alec Berntson <alecb@windows.microsoft.com>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
I am merely thinking of extensibility. in 5 years from now, maybe civic address turns out to be the bread and butter of geolocation apps We could continue to support the simplified address form (whatever we call it), and easily add a new attribute |civicAddress| which is the entire 30+ attribute data structure. On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com> > wrote: >> i was thinking that there might be an optional |civicAddress| >> attribute at a >> later point. so, having a prefix provides consistency. >> > > Hmm, do we really want two address fields...? > > Andrei
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 18:58:50 UTC