W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

Re: ISSUE-10 Re: Geopriv compromise proposal

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:23:17 +0100
Message-ID: <708552fb0906181523x3b020bdfrb0baebd13809e9a0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Dear Rigo,

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rigo Wenning<rigo@w3.org> wrote:
> there. This group has to invest 2 more neurons to get rid of me.

This is what you said yesterday:

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote:
> Having this in your issue tracker is sufficient. And I want to be
> clear that I do NOT want to hold you up.

I filed the issue tracker so, according to you, that is sufficient.

> I clearly say here that I'm not satisfied with the way this group
> closes this issue.

Ok. This is what the W3C Process Document has to say about this:

"Dissenters cannot stop a group's work simply by saying that they
cannot live with a decision. When the Chair believes that the Group
has duly considered the legitimate concerns of dissenters as far as is
possible and reasonable, the group should move on."


We have decied on this issue not once, but twice. It does not make any
sense to endlessly repeat the same arguments. I would like to kindly
ask the Chairs to settle this situation once and for all.

Many thanks,
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 22:23:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC