- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:23:17 +0100
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Dear Rigo, On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rigo Wenning<rigo@w3.org> wrote: > > there. This group has to invest 2 more neurons to get rid of me. > This is what you said yesterday: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > > Having this in your issue tracker is sufficient. And I want to be > clear that I do NOT want to hold you up. I filed the issue tracker so, according to you, that is sufficient. > I clearly say here that I'm not satisfied with the way this group > closes this issue. > Ok. This is what the W3C Process Document has to say about this: "Dissenters cannot stop a group's work simply by saying that they cannot live with a decision. When the Chair believes that the Group has duly considered the legitimate concerns of dissenters as far as is possible and reasonable, the group should move on." http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#managing-dissent We have decied on this issue not once, but twice. It does not make any sense to endlessly repeat the same arguments. I would like to kindly ask the Chairs to settle this situation once and for all. Many thanks, Andrei
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 22:23:59 UTC