W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

Re: ISSUE-10 Re: Geopriv compromise proposal

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:23:17 +0100
Message-ID: <708552fb0906181523x3b020bdfrb0baebd13809e9a0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Dear Rigo,

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rigo Wenning<rigo@w3.org> wrote:
>
> there. This group has to invest 2 more neurons to get rid of me.
>

This is what you said yesterday:

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Having this in your issue tracker is sufficient. And I want to be
> clear that I do NOT want to hold you up.


I filed the issue tracker so, according to you, that is sufficient.

> I clearly say here that I'm not satisfied with the way this group
> closes this issue.
>

Ok. This is what the W3C Process Document has to say about this:

"Dissenters cannot stop a group's work simply by saying that they
cannot live with a decision. When the Chair believes that the Group
has duly considered the legitimate concerns of dissenters as far as is
possible and reasonable, the group should move on."

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#managing-dissent

We have decied on this issue not once, but twice. It does not make any
sense to endlessly repeat the same arguments. I would like to kindly
ask the Chairs to settle this situation once and for all.

Many thanks,
Andrei
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 22:23:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC