W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

Re: WebIDL, optional attributes

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:33:49 +0100
Message-ID: <708552fb0906100533k6a0e93fbse04802d339880baa@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
> WebIDL seems to be the normative format for Geolocation API:
> "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification, as this specification uses that specification's terminology. [WEBIDL]"
> and "double" is not in WebIDL.
> WebIDL is also still a WD and I assume there could be a discussion in the WebApps WG about "float" and "double".
> I hope both groups will come to a conclusion promptly.

Yes, I will ask the question about it. Or, are you part of the WebApps
WG? In that case, perhaps you could bring up the issue with them?

> WRT moving to LC I assume the "double" issue shall be clarified during the LC at the latest.

Sure, I don't think it should prevent us from moving to last call.

Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 12:34:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC