- From: Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:52:10 -0700
- To: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Jun 4, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Doug Turner wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Max Froumentin wrote: > >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On 4. juni. 2009, at 12.49, Andrei Popescu wrote: >>> I've just updated the editor drafts of the Geolocation API spec: >> >> I notice that RFC2119 is not in the bibliography, even though >> there's a link to it in the spec. >> >>> I'd like to take the opportunity to remind you to consider the >>> question in the following email: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Jun/0000.html >>> >>> and express your opinion. I would like to close this issue asap and >>> move the spec to the next stage. We are already behind schedule. >> >> For what it's worth, I am in also favour of not including the >> additional sentence. For the reasons you mention, but also because >> prose of the form "this specification doesn't mandate a way to... >> however one way might be...", although not strictly contradictory, >> very often leads to confusion. Secondly, the particular time- >> scoping solution mentioned suggests awkward user interaction, and >> might influence implementers the wrong way. > > +1 drop this from the spec. +1 to drop this from the spec. -- Greg
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 15:52:50 UTC