- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:32:15 +0200
- To: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:19:19 +0200, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote: > FWIW, I agree with Angel that the "shoulds" above should be "musts." If > the whole section is going to be non-normative anyway, what's the harm? If the text is going to be non-normative it should not use RFC 2119 terminology at all because that just creates confusion. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2009 11:33:13 UTC