RE: editor's draft should link to last published draft

Has there been a revision to the draft that I can review that
incorporates some of the feedback I provided?

allan

-----Original Message-----
From: public-geolocation-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-geolocation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Turner
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 7:30 AM
To: Andrei Popescu
Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad; Max Froumentin; public-geolocation@w3.org
Subject: Re: editor's draft should link to last published draft

Please add another issue for the useLowPower/highAccuracy flag name.   
I would like to see this resolved before last call.


On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:45 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>  
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Lars Erik Bolstad
<lbolstad@opera.com 
>>> > wrote:
>>>> It is overdue.
>>>>
>>>> In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open  
>>>> issues, of
>>>> which there are currently three:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open
>>>>
>>>> ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information?
>>>> This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not  
>>>> include
>>>> privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API
>>>> This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our  
>>>> transition to
>>>> last call for "version 1".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and  
>>>> privacy
>>>> considerations?
>>>> Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the  
>>>> editor's
>>>> draft. I think it looks good.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, will ping the list once I'm done.
>>>
>>
>> Done. I have also did
>
> s/did/made :)
>
> Andrei

Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 14:40:18 UTC