- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:30:21 -0700
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
Please add another issue for the useLowPower/highAccuracy flag name. I would like to see this resolved before last call. On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:45 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com >>> > wrote: >>>> It is overdue. >>>> >>>> In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open >>>> issues, of >>>> which there are currently three: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open >>>> >>>> ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information? >>>> This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not >>>> include >>>> privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead. >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>>> ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API >>>> This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our >>>> transition to >>>> last call for "version 1". >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>>> ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and >>>> privacy >>>> considerations? >>>> Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the >>>> editor's >>>> draft. I think it looks good. >>>> >>> >>> Ok, will ping the list once I'm done. >>> >> >> Done. I have also did > > s/did/made :) > > Andrei
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 14:31:03 UTC