- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:51:51 +0000
- To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote: > I though the group had discussed "reverse geocoding", which, I admit, is > more complicated. This is just defining a format. I'm not sure why we'd define a new interface (i.e. 'Civic') if there is no way to produce objects that implement it. Or if we do specify a way to produce such objects (e.g. your example suggests adding a 'civic' attribute to the Position interface) then I don't see how we'd be able to completely separate the discussion from reverse geocoding. I think the two should be discussed at the same time. Andrei
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 18:52:32 UTC