- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:06:11 -0800
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Cc: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
On Nov 11, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Thomson, Martin > <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote: >> Hi Andrei, >> >> I think that you've got it, but rather than could, I'm saying >> "should". The API shouldn't assume that the two have the same >> source, but it doesn't need to be. >> >> Rather than saying that we should revisit reverse geocoding in >> version 2, you should be saying that we should revisit _civic >> addresses_ in version 2. > > Ok, fair enough. I suspect we'll see more demand for this once this > spec opens up to a larger audience, so I believe it'll be one of the > top discussion items for v2. > > All the best, > Andrei +1
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 18:13:36 UTC