- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:00:36 -0700
- To: public-geolocation@w3.org
- CC: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, locweb@lists.berkeley.edu
hello geolocation! i have not yet introduced myself to this list, but now that i am posting, here is a brief intro: i have been working on various aspects of web technology for a long time, and for the last year, geolocation has become an increasingly important concept for me. one of my current research focuses is on the mobile web and geolocation. at WWW2008 last april, i organized the "first international workshop on location and the web (LocWeb2008)". my goal was to attract papers from the intersection of web technologies and more traditional geo-oriented areas. while i think the workshop was a success, it definitely had an emphasis on the geo side and fewer web-related papers than i would have liked. http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2008/05/locweb-2008-pro.html that being said, i think it would be very good if the geolocation concepts in various pieces of web technology (the most important being HTTP, URI, HTML, and DOM) were aligned. if all these things are being developed in isolation, it is less likely that there is one geolocation concept that is reused in various technologies. my hope was and still is that the W3C will recognize the need for a concerted effort among various pieces of web architecture to be augmented with geolocation features, and will develop geolocation concepts which can be reused in various contexts. i do understand that this thinking is probably more top-down than bottom-up and may not appeal to everybody. but what i want to do is to point out that this would be a good moment in time to make a decision whether geolocation should be approached by the W3C as a strategic direction, or on a one-by-one basis. > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/06/geolocation/charter/ as i pointed out, i am new to this list and thus i don't know the history of this list and the planned working group. the charter as it is currently drafted is rather narrow, and that is by intent, i guess. i am curious to hear what others think about the scope of the charter (after all, it's the "geolocation working group" and not the "DOM location module" working group), and specifically, what people think about a more strategic approach to geolocation on the web. kind regards, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 17:01:30 UTC