- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:00:36 -0700
- To: public-geolocation@w3.org
- CC: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, locweb@lists.berkeley.edu
hello geolocation!
i have not yet introduced myself to this list, but now that i am
posting, here is a brief intro: i have been working on various aspects
of web technology for a long time, and for the last year, geolocation
has become an increasingly important concept for me. one of my current
research focuses is on the mobile web and geolocation.
at WWW2008 last april, i organized the "first international workshop on
location and the web (LocWeb2008)". my goal was to attract papers from
the intersection of web technologies and more traditional geo-oriented
areas. while i think the workshop was a success, it definitely had an
emphasis on the geo side and fewer web-related papers than i would have
liked.
http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2008/05/locweb-2008-pro.html
that being said, i think it would be very good if the geolocation
concepts in various pieces of web technology (the most important being
HTTP, URI, HTML, and DOM) were aligned. if all these things are being
developed in isolation, it is less likely that there is one geolocation
concept that is reused in various technologies.
my hope was and still is that the W3C will recognize the need for a
concerted effort among various pieces of web architecture to be
augmented with geolocation features, and will develop geolocation
concepts which can be reused in various contexts.
i do understand that this thinking is probably more top-down than
bottom-up and may not appeal to everybody. but what i want to do is to
point out that this would be a good moment in time to make a decision
whether geolocation should be approached by the W3C as a strategic
direction, or on a one-by-one basis.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/06/geolocation/charter/
as i pointed out, i am new to this list and thus i don't know the
history of this list and the planned working group. the charter as it is
currently drafted is rather narrow, and that is by intent, i guess. i am
curious to hear what others think about the scope of the charter (after
all, it's the "geolocation working group" and not the "DOM location
module" working group), and specifically, what people think about a more
strategic approach to geolocation on the web.
kind regards,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 17:01:30 UTC