W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > June 2019

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [geometry] DOMMatrix constructor is a performance and code portability footgun (#346)

From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:11:24 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-503153274-1560867083-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
OK, but was the goal to remove "overloading" in the sense of using Web IDL overloads, or to reduce the set of things that could be passed in?  Because we can easily add `DOMMatrixReadOnly` to the union, right?

(Note that this situation is quite different from the one for `DOMPoint`, `DOMRect`, etc.)

GitHub Notification of comment by bzbarsky
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/346#issuecomment-503153274 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2019 14:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 June 2019 14:11:30 UTC