W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-motion] description of offset-position should be clearer

From: ewilligers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:30:12 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-309641775-1497933011-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I suspect the best way to thing of the motion path properties is that they create a transform from where the element would be, without any of the motion path or transform properties, to the position that the motion path properties specify.

> +If 'position' is specified with 'static', 'offset-position' would be ignored.

Why? 'static' is the initial value for position, and the spec has numerous examples offset-position is set and position is not. Should they all be updated to explicitly set position? What is the benefit?



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/45#issuecomment-309641775 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 04:30:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 November 2018 00:45:59 UTC