W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fxtf-archive@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [fxtf-drafts] [css-motion] description of offset-position should be clearer

From: ewilligers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 04:30:12 +0000
To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-309641775-1497933011-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I suspect the best way to thing of the motion path properties is that they create a transform from where the element would be, without any of the motion path or transform properties, to the position that the motion path properties specify.

> +If 'position' is specified with 'static', 'offset-position' would be ignored.

Why? 'static' is the initial value for position, and the spec has numerous examples offset-position is set and position is not. Should they all be updated to explicitly set position? What is the benefit?

GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/45#issuecomment-309641775 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 04:30:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:21 UTC