W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2017

Re: [paint] Publishing FPWD of Fill and Stroke Module

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:38:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBq7QV7B5u=008Sd9LN-rVmBZSGDRqpXugYWdRdahupoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds
<amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure that would be web-compatible.  It breaks any case where `fill`
> is set with the expectation that it would inherit into inline SVG.

Yes, if it was set somewhere in HTML with the expectation that it
inherits into inline SVG.  Hopefully rare-to-nonexistent; if not, we
can pursue a more complicated solution.

> Unless
> you really meant only "svg:root" elements, in which case all my original
> concerns still apply to inline SVG.
>
> Either way, I'd still recommend adding an issue to the spec, to look into
> the compat issues.
>
> And of course, for any version that requires new user-agent stylesheet
> rules, we'll need a section of the spec for that.  (I assume this is the
> part you were "planning to do"!)

Yeah, we've done it now - you can check the spec. ^_^

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 21:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:59 UTC