- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:24:53 +0330
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hey everyone, Since we *ostensibly* have a goal of getting CSS Transforms to CR, I have compiled a list of all issues that require further discussion and put them on the agenda for Seattle for you to discuss. Per WG resolution to re-split the module, this list only includes the issues relevant to 2D transforms. You can find this list here: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-1/issues-wd-2013 It covers May 2012 through today, including discussions in Bugzilla, www-style, public-fx, and GitHub. You're welcome. Please humor me by being prepared to discuss the issues. Fwiw, none of them seem particularly intractable, merely thus far not entirely tracked. Issues that appear to need WG discussion (or at least, the half of the WG that understands the issue) are marked as =WG=. Issues that merely need the editors to do something are marked =ED=. I will note that Transforms is not a spec that I follow, so this is all approximate to the best of my limited ability. The issues list is compiled by hand using a text format derived from the lists that Hixie used to maintain of CSS2.1 issues reported to www-style. It is formatted with a script which you can find here: https://drafts.csswg.org/bin/issuegen.pl The script also includes documentation on the format. For an editor to declare an issue as closed, the procedure is as follows: 1. Post a message saying whether or not changes where made and why, and if changes were made, describe them or link to them as appropriate. If a WG resolution was made, link to the minutes. Here is an example of such a message: http://www.w3.org/mid/4FFDE5E3.6030004@inkedblade.net (As I could not find such a message in most of the Transforms threads, I assumed no conclusion was reached for most of the issues.) 2. If the discussion is being tracked somewhere (like, we're in a bug database, or you're maintaining an out-of-band issues list like the DoC above), change the associated status to Closed. To do this in the issues-list format a. Add a link to the concluding message as a Response: line so that the conclusion is tracked. b. Change the status from Open to Closed: [appropriate keyword] c. Optionally, add lines for Changes: or Resolved: or Verified: (See documentation.) Regenerating the HTML will color the issue appropriately. Follow-ups to public-fx, please. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2016 12:55:38 UTC