On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > On 22/09/16 9:00 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > > I think you just showed that Matt's proposal can be emulated with the > current spec. > > > I don't think this is true. Firstly, this example still wasn't as good as > I think mine could be. Secondly, it requires complex matrix manipulation by > the author, which basically rules out animations/transitions. > That's true. Tien-Ren's math skills are quite impressive :-) > Given that: > > - this is shipping in Chrome [1] > - Safari committed to support it [2] > - Edge is in favor [3] > - Firefox has already implemented it [4] > - your new proposal is more complex to implement and hard to understand > - your new proposal can be emulated > > > I agreed (and changed Firefox) under the assumption that little to no web > content would be affected. > That still holds true: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/ feature/popularity#OpacityWithPreserve3DQuirk Current usage is 0.0036% of all page loads. Reading the thread on Blink's intent to ship [1], because of overcounting, the number of affected sites is even less and some of the firefox bug reports are because of other FF issues. [2] Also, content WAS already broken on the web since there were 4 non-compatible implementations. In addition, your proposal *also* affects web content because opacity is now applied to the group instead of being distributed to the children. > This thread was started by an author who's content was broken, so it seems > reasonable to re-visit these assumptions. > Yes, we went over his examples and told him how to fix it (= apply opacity to the elements) Since Firefox knows that it's flattening, could it create a warning in the console and point to an MDN page with more information? 1: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/eBIp90_il1o/jrxzMW_4BQAJ <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/eBIp90_il1o/jrxzMW_4BQAJ> 2: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1250718 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278021 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1229317
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:37:51 UTC