- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:18:21 +1300
- To: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 02:18:53 UTC
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Sebastian Zartner < sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 February 2016 at 09:28, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > >> Implementing ::backdrop for every element would be pretty hard for us and >> not something I'd want to do. >> > > > Can you elaborate on this? > ::backdrop only applies to "top layer" elements so there's some special-casing we can do to simplify the layout and rendering of ::backdrop. If you allow ::backdrop on non-top-layer elements then it can appear anywhere. > And would it generally be hard to implement or only for Mozilla? > I don't know. > And if it's generally hard to implement, let's discuss another solution. > And what about the other parts of the suggested approach? > I guess I don't understand why we need backdrop-filter at all. Why can't authors use BackgroundImage with the 'filter' property to get the same effects? Is it because they'd have to use SVG filters and a standalone CSS property is easier to use? Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 02:18:53 UTC