- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:27:59 -0700
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> We've switched url() over to a function, so we can add arguments to it. > > Doesn't url(A, B) currently mean "try A, and if that doesn't work try B"? Nope, it currently means nothing and is invalid. You're thinking of the image() function. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote: > I wonder how often what authors *really* want is the ability to pass > parameters to the SVG (a la this old WD: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGParamPrimer/ ) That's a separate topic; they both mention the word "parameters", but in totally different contexts. (But yes, once rebased to be based on CSS variables, that's also very desirable.) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 18:28:49 UTC