Re: [motion-path] More natural names for 'auto' and 'reverse'

Drive-by comment - the grammar as specified (`[ auto | reverse ] &&
<<angle>>`) is incorrect per the examples - it requires a keyword.
I'd correct it, but I'm not 100% certain what you were shooting for.

`[ auto | reverse ] || <<angle>>` is probably what you want - one or
both, in any order.

On the other hand, people seem to often use && thinking it means "at
least one of these, in order".  If that's the case, you instead need
`[ [ auto | reverse ]? <<angle>>? ]!`.  (You probably don't want this,
it's awkward to write on purpose.)


Received on Monday, 22 June 2015 18:24:31 UTC