- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:21:39 +0200
- To: public-fx@w3.org
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Hi all, http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ says "The DOMRectList interface is at-risk. The authors of this specification await feedback from implementers if the item() function of DOMRectList is currently in use on legacy interfaces. If there is no/not enough content to justify DOMRectList, legacy interfaces must use sequences instead and DOMRectList will be removed from this specification." Chrome 43 reached the stable channel about a week ago, and it had a use counter in Blink to answer this very question: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/694 Compare that to another use counter also in the same release: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/696 When usage rounds to zero as for ClientRectList.item(), it means that <0.0001% of page loads are affected. This is no guarantee that replacing ClientRectList with sequence<ClientRect> as the return value of Element.getClientRects() and Range.getClientRects() would be safe, but it's promising. (Dirk Schulze suggested that I notify public-fx and www-style.) Philip
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 13:22:07 UTC