- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:44:17 -0800
- To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: > If all the isolation property does is create a stacking context [1][2] then > it seems like it should be called stacking-context: true to reveal it's > purpose, otherwise we're just going to have blog posts about the "secret css > hacks" to create stacking contexts using isolation: isolate as stacking > contexts have all kinds of other side effects. Well, we don't use boolean arguments - we add additional options too often, and want to avoid a true/false/file_not_found situation. But otherwise, yeah, agree. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:45:07 UTC