- From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:04:59 +0900
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-fx@w3.org
- CC: "shans@google.com" <shans@google.com>
I've updated the spec now starting at: http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#processing-the-effect-parameter (Not that named anchors really work with respec, but it's section 5.9.4) Changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rev/7e29a8906626 Hopefully all these issues are now addressed. (2014/04/16 16:33), Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/16/14 3:19 AM, Brian Birtles wrote: >> I'll spec this as doing the coercions for the timing argument first then >> the funky effect/keyframe handling. > > To be clear, that behavior will fall out automatically if "object?" is > used in the IDL and the keyframe bits are done in prose. > >> I guess we should say that in the case of Animatable.animate, the >> "object" argument is processed (normalized) before constructing the >> Animation object (i.e. it isn't processed by the constructor of the >> Animation object) although I wonder if there's any observable difference. > > I don't think there's an observable difference. > > -Boris
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 06:05:27 UTC