Re: Processing model for the first argument of Animatable.animate is not well defined

I've updated the spec now starting at:

   http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#processing-the-effect-parameter
   (Not that named anchors really work with respec, but it's section 5.9.4)

   Changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rev/7e29a8906626

Hopefully all these issues are now addressed.

(2014/04/16 16:33), Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 4/16/14 3:19 AM, Brian Birtles wrote:
>> I'll spec this as doing the coercions for the timing argument first then
>> the funky effect/keyframe handling.
>
> To be clear, that behavior will fall out automatically if "object?" is
> used in the IDL and the keyframe bits are done in prose.
>
>> I guess we should say that in the case of Animatable.animate, the
>> "object" argument is processed (normalized) before constructing the
>> Animation object (i.e. it isn't processed by the constructor of the
>> Animation object) although I wonder if there's any observable difference.
>
> I don't think there's an observable difference.
>
> -Boris

Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 06:05:27 UTC