W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Processing model for the first argument of Animatable.animate is not well defined

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 03:33:09 -0400
Message-ID: <534E3235.4030109@mit.edu>
To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, public-fx@w3.org
CC: "shans@google.com" <shans@google.com>
On 4/16/14 3:19 AM, Brian Birtles wrote:
> I'll spec this as doing the coercions for the timing argument first then
> the funky effect/keyframe handling.

To be clear, that behavior will fall out automatically if "object?" is 
used in the IDL and the keyframe bits are done in prose.

> I guess we should say that in the case of Animatable.animate, the
> "object" argument is processed (normalized) before constructing the
> Animation object (i.e. it isn't processed by the constructor of the
> Animation object) although I wonder if there's any observable difference.

I don't think there's an observable difference.

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 07:33:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:49 UTC