W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: [css-compositing] Isolation groups

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:40:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDAkYQ7TtWCmgsuBxsyccuY0mTex9RMgjBRotRnhGo=A2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I have a few questions about the spec:
>
> Section 3.3: I don't understand how blending creates an isolation group.
> If I set 'mix-mode-blend' on a circle and the circle gets blended with
> the background, what is the isolation group? An example would really
> help.
>

there's an example in the section on isolation:
http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1/#isolationblending
It is the circle that becomes the isolated group so if there's blending
inside the content that has the blend-mode, it will be isolated to that
content.


> Example 4: It appears that the three circles are being blended in one
> isolation group and then put over the gray background. What is causing
> the circles to be isolated? If the SVG is referenced from an <img> then
> it should be isolated but if it is included inline then it should not
> be(?). If I try the SVG in Chrome the circles are never isolated, no
> matter what I do (stand-alone SVG, external SVG, inline). Is this due to
> a lack of isolation support in Chrome?
>

Can you post your example online (codepen, jsfiddle)?
There should be a difference since if you link them using <img>, the SVG
should be rasterized.


>
> Example 4: Minor quibble: The green color depicted is 'lime', not
> 'green'.
>
> Also, example numbering skips numbers.
>

Thanks! I will fix this.
Received on Monday, 9 December 2013 17:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:47 UTC