Re: [web-animations] Naming of timing groups in the API

Another suggestion:

ParGroup -> TimedGroup,
SeqGroup -> TimedChain

- Doug


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:

> (2013/11/07 11:12), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with SyncGroup.  Yeah, there's punning with "synchronous",
>> but if you can avoid that it's well-named - people use "sync" for
>> synchronizing plenty.
>>
>
> Summarising where I think we're up to so far:
>
> * ParGroup,SeqGroup - not descriptive enough
> * ParallelGroup,SequenceGroup - spelling of Parallel is troublesome
> * SyncGroup,SequenceGroup
>   - 'Sync' may have other meanings (but ok?)
>   - Both start with 's' = hard to distinguish?
>
> My vote is still with SyncGroup.
>
> One more alternative (which if nothing else might just make SyncGroup seem
> better), is TogetherGroup.
>
> i.e. TogetherGroup and SequenceGroup and <together> and <sequence>.
>
> A bit weird I guess, not to mention long.
>
> Any more suggestions?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brian
>
>