Re: Proposal: feHSL element (was Re: [filter-effects] hue-rotate() and saturate() filters)

Hello Dean,

Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:10:41 PM, you wrote:


> On 17 Oct 2013, at 8:59 am, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

>> Hello Rik,
>> 
>> Wednesday, October 16, 2013, 10:59:11 PM, you wrote:
>> 
>>> It seems that this should work and be lightweight.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>>> I'm unsure if we should add a new filter element or just update the CSS shorthands.
>> 
>> I suggest both; update the CSS shorthands to point to this, and add
>> the filter so that longhand (user constructed) filters can use it as
>> one component.

> As sucky as the results of hue-rotate currently are, the fact that it
> is described as a matrix operation means we can implement it easily
> with hardware acceleration on less powerful platforms.

Agreed.

Also, there will be content where the author tweaked until
they got the result they wanted; if we modify the definition in place
it will break that content.

> For that reason I’d be hesitant to change the definition to something
> that would require us to regress performance. So I guess I’m voting
> for a new operation and keyword.

Yes.




-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 15:01:47 UTC