- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:31:27 -0700
- To: Shawn Singh <shawnsingh@google.com>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
This was actually not meant to be for the public mailing list. Just answered to the wrong mail :P I apologize. On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > I hope I did not frighten you with my answer :) The process seems strict but isn't that painful. I would very welcome input from you. I hope we can continue the discussion about Transforms on the mailing list or the bug reports you opened independent of the process of the W3C. > > Greetings, > Dirk > > > On Sep 25, 2013, at 5:51 AM, Shawn Singh <shawnsingh@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I posted a few concerns about the 3d transforms spect, for backface-visibility and preserve-3d attributes, on their bugzilla page. Instead of repeating the information, here are the links to the issues: >> >> I think spec is wrong about how to correctly implement backface-visibility checks: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23014 >> >> preserve-3d semantics can be interpreted in two different ways, can we please clarify the spec: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23015 >> >> I hope to hear people's feedback and ultimately get the spec updated if possible. >> >> Best, >> ~Shawn >> > >
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:31:56 UTC