W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: DOMPoint dictionary problem

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:07:26 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZBDEu0wVMWoMrbG3bbqH0xeEyYgQ+JJYPqY2BWZ7-_AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Jet Villegas W3C <w3c@junglecode.net>, Cameron McCormack <heycam@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mozilla.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:

> I still think it would be useful to resolve decisions on DOMPoint together
> with a view to the needs of DOMMatrix which uses a Point definition as
> well. The current definition of Point in DOMMatrix is a dictionary and
> should have been compatible with DOMPoint dictionary. It is my
> understanding that this does not need to be the case with an interface
> DOMPoint. Difference: DOMPoint just has the attributes 'x' and 'y'. Point
> in DOMMatrix has at least a third parameter 'z' and possibly a forth 'w'
> (needs a resolution).

We can just add 'z' and 'w' attributes to DOMPoint.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 09:08:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:46 UTC