- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:49:23 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Sep 13, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Sorry - I meant the mask-image property. The mask-box-image-source > property allows 'none' or <image>. There is no text below that says what > the various kinds of <image> mean for the property (though if you're using > the oldest reference, you probably just need the one <image> entry). And > it has the same stacking context text as mask-image, but what happens in > an image loading failure is different. If the value of > mask-box-image-source points to an empty image, does the mask still occur? > I was thinking it would be best for the mask-image and > mask-box-image-source descriptions to be as similar as possible. Yes, I agree. I changed the specification text to be more explicit on mask-box-image-source. More exactly, it matches the text on mask-image as close as possible. Greetings, Dirk > > Thanks, > > Alan >
Received on Saturday, 14 September 2013 08:49:46 UTC