W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: [masking] Comments on September 13 editor's draft

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 01:49:23 -0700
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3CAF6A9C-FEAF-47FF-876E-50ED8966DB7A@adobe.com>

On Sep 13, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> Sorry - I meant the mask-image property. The mask-box-image-source
> property allows 'none' or <image>. There is no text below that says what
> the various kinds of <image> mean for the property (though if you're using
> the oldest reference, you probably just need the one <image> entry). And
> it has the same stacking context text as mask-image, but what happens in
> an image loading failure is different. If the value of
> mask-box-image-source points to an empty image, does the mask still occur?
> I was thinking it would be best for the mask-image and
> mask-box-image-source descriptions to be as similar as possible.

Yes, I agree. I changed the specification text to be more explicit on mask-box-image-source. More exactly, it matches the text on mask-image as close as possible.


> Thanks,
> Alan
Received on Saturday, 14 September 2013 08:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:46 UTC