- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:02:49 -0700
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Cc: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Of the four options you propose for Element.animate, it feels like option > (2) would lead to inconsistency when moving from Element.animate to new > Animation (i.e. re-introduce the problem we are trying to avoid), and option > (4) is a very heavy-weight solution. Hence I'm inclined to prefer option (1) > (leave as it, Authors just have to work harder to use Element.animate) or > option (3) (add Element.animateTo as an extra shorthand). > > Perhaps option (1) for now, and reserve the right to introduce (3) in > response to feedback? I'm with Shane. #3 is probably the way to go, but I'd like to wait for feedback on it before agreeing to it, so #1 for now. I'd put an issue in at some reasonable point saying that we might do an animateTo that shortcuts this, though. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 16:03:40 UTC