- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:44:20 -0800
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > On 5/01/13 12:31 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> We had this discussion on the SVG meeting before. I brought about the >> same issue. Back then we decided that it needs more investigation why >> SVGMaskElement is not transformable in the first place. I would >> prefer making it transformable as well for consistency reasons. > > I have a poor memory for this kind of thing. :) > >> PS: Just curious: Why did you mail that to public-fx and not >> www-svg? > > Because these elements now live in the CSS Masking specification. Ahh, didn't realize that there is a [css-masking] prefix. I am sorry :) Greetings, Dirk
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 01:44:51 UTC