Re: [css-masking] transform on SVGClipPathElement and SVGMaskElement

On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

> On 5/01/13 12:31 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> We had this discussion on the SVG meeting before. I brought about the
>> same issue. Back then we decided that it needs more investigation why
>> SVGMaskElement is not transformable in the first place. I would
>> prefer making it transformable as well for consistency reasons.
> 
> I have a poor memory for this kind of thing. :)
> 
>> PS: Just curious: Why did you mail that to public-fx and not
>> www-svg?
> 
> Because these elements now live in the CSS Masking specification.

Ahh, didn't realize that there is a [css-masking] prefix. I am sorry :)

Greetings,
Dirk