- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:33:39 +1100
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: public-fx@w3.org
On 5/01/13 12:31 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > We had this discussion on the SVG meeting before. I brought about the > same issue. Back then we decided that it needs more investigation why > SVGMaskElement is not transformable in the first place. I would > prefer making it transformable as well for consistency reasons. I have a poor memory for this kind of thing. :) > PS: Just curious: Why did you mail that to public-fx and not > www-svg? Because these elements now live in the CSS Masking specification.
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 01:34:09 UTC