On 5/01/13 12:31 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > We had this discussion on the SVG meeting before. I brought about the > same issue. Back then we decided that it needs more investigation why > SVGMaskElement is not transformable in the first place. I would > prefer making it transformable as well for consistency reasons. I have a poor memory for this kind of thing. :) > PS: Just curious: Why did you mail that to public-fx and not > www-svg? Because these elements now live in the CSS Masking specification.Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 01:34:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:44 UTC