- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:56:17 +1000
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Rik Cabanier wrote: > Great! > Is everyone OK with the term 'stacking context' for SVG? They are > different from the ones in HTML (= they don't follow the z-index note > [1]) so this could be confusing. I'm not sure what the problem is with using the same name. The zindex.html chapter in CSS 2.1 defines how CSS boxes are rendered and how stacking contexts influence that, but it doesn't define which things cause stacking contexts to exist. (That's defined by individual properties.) We (in SVG) should define how SVG elements render, in render.html, with reference to stacking contexts too.
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 01:56:54 UTC