- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 04:33:04 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDCOAFo2dpnw9d-RD9Zy6BBZwZEGuc4RWevQwa6FE3zxTw@mail.gmail.com>
How would you define it for SVG since it has no concept of a 'stacking context'? For HTML, you eventually end up at the 'elaborate description of stacking contexts' but there is no such thing for SVG. Rik On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask to remove the specific behavior of the 'isolation' > property[1] in CSS compositing. At the moment this property links to and > HTML [2] and and SVG [3] section. First of all, this limits compositing to > just HTML and SVG. This is not the sense of CSS. Second, reading the > sections, this should really be defined by the individual specs. I think we > should just use the definition used in the HTML section. Filter Effects, > CSS Transforms and CSS Masking already define that a stacking context is > created (for all elements). > > However, I do believe that a simple note of all elements that create a > stacking context (until the time being of the spec of course) can be useful > for authors. The list does not need to be complete, but cover most common > properties. This note would be useful for HTML and SVG authors in the same > way. > > Greetings, > Dirk > > [1] > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#isolation > [2] > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#csscompositingrules_CSS > [3] > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#csscompositingrules_SVG >
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 11:33:30 UTC