On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>wrote: > Rik Cabanier skriver: > > > > It would not. > > An 'inverse' mask would invert the pixels of the mask itself, not the > > content that you mask. > > > > Maybe you're thinking of putting the text in the mask. If so, yes, that > > would make it invert but: > > - you'd lose the semantics since the text comes from a style. This loses > > accessibility and copy/paste behavior > > - you would have to put the text in another fragment or document > > - you would have to define a way to link to HTML content from a mask. > > This would be very hard to get consensus on. > > I thought there was an option to use the first result of a normal > selector as the masking content. > Not that I know of. Dirk, is there such an option?
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 20:08:20 UTC