Re: Agenda for CSS/FX WG

Hi

On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:48 AM, "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:21:20 +0100, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I thought we were to have a phone call today.  I wanted to get closure on CSS Animations on SVG
> 
> It was discussed on a call a few weeks ago (http://www.w3.org/2012/01/23-fx-minutes.html), and the conclusion was to invite wider feedback from the css community, which was ACTION-65 (https://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/actions/65).
> 
> The resulting thread is here:
> 
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0333.html.
> 
> The action following that, is ACTION-66 (https://www.w3.org/Graphics/fx/track/actions/66) - to create an specification draft based on the proposal, you're more than welcome to take over that action.
> 
>> and I know others have wanted to get closure on conversion of attribute to presentation for transforms.
>> Can we get an agenda together or perhaps some resolutions on this alias?
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/#svg-transform seems pretty clear to me, but I note that there are many other open issues that need further discussion, any particular one you were interested in?

I agree that there are some open questions for moving SVG attributes to presentation attributes in general. Transform is just a specific example. I am working on a wiki for the transition an problems with SVG DOM. I will post the wiki this afternoon. If you see more transform specific issues than there are on the merged transform wiki page, can you file them in bugzilla or send them to this list please?

Greetings,
Dirk

> 
> I'll send out an agenda for the Feb 13 call this week, I'll make sure these topics are included.
> 
> Cheers
> -- 
> Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
> Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
> Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 15:43:23 UTC