- From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:08:25 +0300
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > Does it matter if it's code that only the author understands? It's obviously > working well enough for Wikipedia to create formulas and they have much more > complex math than us. > It seems that we would have to do quite a bit of work ourselves (including > learning LaTex) instead of just using texvc. I think you're misunderstanding what texvc does -- it basically does nothing but parse the input, make sure it looks like valid LaTeX with all commands on its internal whitelist, wraps it in some boilerplate, and then shells out to latex. Pretty much any valid texvc input is already valid LaTeX, give or take some macros that texvc recognizes and missing boilerplate that it adds. Everything you're entering into Wikipedia's <math> tags *is* LaTeX. So there's not much gained by not just using LaTeX. The effort of trying to get texvc set up in a non-MediaWiki environment would likely be more than just learning how to add the extra boilerplate LaTeX will want. Also, if all you want is a few PNGs, you can just enter the code in Wikipedia, preview, and save the PNG. That's the easiest way. (Former MediaWiki developer here, BTW. :) )
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 09:09:22 UTC