- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:37:32 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org
Dirk Schulze: > > This specification wants to provide backwards compatibility to SVG 1.1, not > to older viewers. If we consider that new content must work on older > Viewers, we can't include any new feature at all. > It is backwards compatibility to SVG 1.1, because this does only allow numbers without units, what is in general a good idea for SVG. Obviously this matters for SVG1.1 viewers, old or new. In general this sections seems to be more related to CSS compatibility, not to backwards compatibility to SVG 1.1, because it introduces new syntax, not really needed for the SVG attribute. Why not so skip units completely for the attribute as it applies already now? For example (X)HTML has no such unit letters 'px' as well - why to care about it in SVG and not in (X)HTML, where it would be much more useful than in SVG to have units like em, ex availlable, not just % and implied px? The syntax for the transform property in this draft is not compatible anyway with the SVG1.1 transform attribute and units not useful for the attribute. Why to care, why to change this - just to please the CSS working group with superflous unit-letters and to annoy authors and the audience with failing documents, just because this new draft contains misleading and manipulative hints for authors of SVG documents, far away from best practice? And of course, it is possible with advanced fallback mechanisms to introduce new features in a backwards compatible way. But if such a draft forces authors to use more complicated new syntax for features, they can be already realised with simpler old syntax, this undermines such a possible fallback mechanism - therefore bad idea, change as suggested or better remove the entire unit thing from the section related to the attribute to avoid the complete problem. Another option is of course to allow an incompatible unit extension, but to remove any suggestion to authors on the question of units, adding only a hint, that in previous SVG versions up to SVG 1.1.1 and SVG tiny 1.2 (this means currently all SVG versions) units are dissallowed. Olaf
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2012 15:38:01 UTC