- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:09:28 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-fx@w3.org
Dirk Schulze: ... > > A bug report [1] on W3C also points out that we should be more clear and > adapt more from SVG 1.1[2] as well as SVG Transform [3]. And I agree. > ... Then, if the draft is still in such an early stage, why to publish this already as a public working draft? If it is not known yet, how the intended effects can be realised or how to specify it, it seems to be toooo early for such a public draft - and even in a public editor draft it should be mentioned, that essential parts are missing and have to be added, before for example the 3D transforms are understandable for the public ;o) I tried and tried to find out, how to simulate this behaviour for some quantitative tests - but no chance with this text. Of course, because current test implementations either ignore 3D completely or in major interesting parts like the projection matrix - there is not much to test yet ;o) Olaf PS: Not only the mailing list to be addressed is changed, the hint, that the SVG group contributes to these efforts is removed as well ;o)
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2012 15:09:58 UTC