- From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:54:44 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFE6CA6.24D49%vhardy@adobe.com>
From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org<mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org>> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:23:29 -0800 To: Adobe Systems <vhardy@adobe.com<mailto:vhardy@adobe.com>> Cc: "public-fx@w3.org<mailto:public-fx@w3.org>" <public-fx@w3.org<mailto:public-fx@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Where should editorial resources on transforms go? On Friday 2011-12-02 11:22 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: On Friday 2011-12-02 11:09 -0800, Vincent Hardy wrote: > From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org<mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org><mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org>> > Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:20:56 -0800 > To: "public-fx@w3.org<mailto:public-fx@w3.org><mailto:public-fx@w3.org>" <public-fx@w3.org<mailto:public-fx@w3.org><mailto:public-fx@w3.org>> > Subject: Re: Where should editorial resources on transforms go? > > On Thursday 2011-12-01 13:08 -0800, Simon Fraser wrote: > On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:27 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ > > a spec that I thought was going to be a merger of the above two, > > but looks like it has only 2-D > This is Vincent's combined spec, and I think should be the > ultimate, all-singing all-dancing 2D/3D/SVG transforms spec. > > What's going to be in this other than what's in 3-D transforms? > More importantly, will that slow down getting to CR, and will it > slow down entering PR? Given the number of implementations we have > of what's in 2-D and 3-D transforms, I think we should prioritize > getting those specs to CR and to REC rather than adding additional > material. > > Hi Dave, > > The agreement for the consolidated spec is to have: > > - 2D > - 3D > - CSS & SVG transforms merged That doesn't answer any of my questions. Er, sorry, I suppose it does answer the first (except that I'm not aware of anything in 2-D that's not also in 3-D). But the second one is the important one. We had that discussion and decided to go for a consolidated spec. Unless there are new arguments for re-opening the discussion, I think we should stick to our decision. Vincent
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 19:55:24 UTC